History of Handwriting Analysis
12 Characteristics of Handwriting:
1. Line quality:
-Is seeing if the pen
marks are smooth and free flowing or shaky and wavering? This could connect to
the speed that the document was written at.
2. Spacing of
words and letters:
-What is meant by the
spacing between letters and words? Is it consistent?
3. Ratio of the relative
height, width and size of letters:
-What is the ratio?
Is it consistent?
4. Pens lifts and
separations:
-Does the person stop
to form new letters and begin words? Some forgeries may have lifts in unusual
places.
5. Connecting
strokes:
-Are the capital
letters connected to lowercase letters and are there connecting strokes between
letters and words?
6. Beginning and
ending strokes:
- Are they straight, curled,
long or short, an upstroke or a down-stroke?
7. Unusual letter
formation:
-Are there any unusually
formed letters such as backward, letters with a tail, or unusual capital
letters?
8. Shading or pen
pressure:
-Is the pen pressure on
the upward or the downward strokes?
9. Slant:
-Is slant left or
right or straight up and down? Is there consistency between the slants of letters?
10. Baseline
habits:
-Is the writing above
or below a line?
11. Flourishes and
embellishments:
-Are there any? If so
what are they?
12. Diacritic
placement:
-How the T’s are
crossed? Also taking note of the
dotting of lowercase I’s and J’s. For example the dots could go to the right or
left of the letter?
How would you tell that they are
forgeries? Which do you think is easier
as a forgery technique: free handing or
tracing?
-My handwriting
My most distinguishing characteristic were Intense
strokes, consistent spacing, lifting of pen when changing words, capital
letters connected to lowercase, Q’s Y’s and G’s were cut off with no curve ,
down strokes, slants down, and J’s were also below the line.
Case:
-Mark Hofmann Case
In 1980, Hofmann said that he
had found a seventeenth-century King James Bible with a folded paper gummed
inside. The document seemed to be the transcript that Joseph Smith's scribe
Martin Harris had presented to Charles Anthon, a Columbia classics professor,
in 1828. According to the Mormon scripture Joseph Smith—History, the transcript
and its unusual "reformed Egyptian" characters were copied by Smith
from the Golden Plates from which he translated the Book of Mormon. Hofmann
constructed his version to fit Anthon's description of the document, and its
"discovery" made Hofmann's reputation. Dean Jessee, an editor of
Joseph Smith's papers and the best-known expert on handwriting and old
documents in the Historical Department of the LDS Church, concluded that the
document was a Joseph Smith holograph. The LDS Church announced the discovery
of the Anthon Transcript in April and purchased it from Hofmann for more than
USD $20,000. Appraised by the LDS church for $25,000, it was purchased on
October 13 in exchange for several artifacts the church owned in duplicate,
including a $5 gold Mormon coin, Deseret banknotes, and a first edition of the
Book of Mormon. Assuming the document to be genuine, prominent Mormon apologist
Hugh Nibley predicted that the discovery promised "as good a test as we'll
ever get of the authenticity of the Book of Mormon" because he thought the
paper might be translated. The eccentric Barry Fell shortly claimed to have
decoded the text. Hofmann promptly dropped out of school and went into business
as a dealer in rare books. He soon fabricated other historically significant
documents and became noted among LDS Church history buffs for his
"discoveries" of previously unknown materials pertaining to the
Latter Day Saint movement. These deceived not only members of the First
Presidency — notably Gordon B. Hinckley — but also document experts and
distinguished historians. Document examiner George Throckmorton analyzed
several Hofmann documents that had previously been deemed authentic and
determined they were forgeries. Throckmorton noted that three letters
purportedly written by Joseph Smith from an Illinois prison used different ink,
paper, and writing instruments. (Because the letters had been authenticated by
different experts, the inconsistencies had earlier escaped detection.)
Throckmorton also discovered that some documents, supposedly written by
different people, had similar writing styles and that they had been written
with homemade iron gall ink that looked cracked like alligator skin under a
microscope, although authentic period documents did not. Investigators also
found that a poem used to authenticate the handwriting in the salamander letter
had been forged by Hofmann and inserted in a Book of Common Prayer once owned
by Martin Harris. Hofmann was arrested for murder and forgery in February 1986.
He initially maintained his innocence; but rather than risk the death penalty,
in January 1987, he plead guilty to two counts of second-degree murder and two
counts of theft by deception, confessing his forgeries in open court. In
January 1988, he was sentenced to life in prison.
Works Cited:
Good info, but it could use a few more pictures to attract my eye;D
ReplyDeletePictures would be very nice.
ReplyDeleteThey are there, I think your internet is not allowing you to see them., but thanks.
ReplyDeleteWhat did you learn from this..
ReplyDeleteWell I learned that everyone has distinctive characteristics and even if it is a trace forgery, one can still be able to tell the difference.
ReplyDeleteYour handwriting analysis postings are dull they need a little bit of flavor but so far you are doing well.
ReplyDeleteHandwriting analysis, or graphology, is the science involved in producing a personality profile of the writer by examining the characteristics, traits and strokes of an individual’s handwriting. Besides creating a complete personality profile, many other things are revealed in your handwriting, such as health issues, morality, past experiences, hidden talents, and mental problems. Graphology School of India offers Handwriting Analysis in Bangalore.
ReplyDeleteHandwriting Analysis India